The biggest misconception with regard to gold – High stock-to-flow ratio is the most important characteristic of gold

In recent weeks, gold has reached new all-time highs in many currencies, including the US dollar, the euro and the Swiss franc. We want to take the euphoric mood among gold investors as an opportunity to focus on a fundamental topic. From our point of view, the gold sector is riddled with an elementary misunderstanding. Many gold investors and analysts operate on an erroneous assumption: they attach too much importance to  annual production and annual demand. We often read that the gold price cannot drop below production costs. We would like to discuss this misconception in the following.

Every gramme of gold that is held for a variety of reasons is for sale at a certain price. Many owners would sell at a price slightly above spot, others would only sell at a substantially higher price. If, due to favorable prices, a private individual wants to sell his gold holdings that he acquired decades ago, it will not reduce the overall supply of gold. All that happens is the transfer from one private portfolio to another private portfolio. To the buyer, it makes no difference whether the gold was produced three weeks or three millennia ago.

This means the annual gold production of currently more than 3,600 tons is of relatively little significance to the pricing process. Rather, the supply side consists of all the gold that has ever been produced. The recycling of existing gold accounts for a much larger share of supply than is the case for other commodities. Paradoxically, gold is not in short supply– the opposite is the case: it is one of the most widely dispersed goods in the world. Given that its industrial use is limited, the majority of all gold ever produced is still available.

In contrast to other commodities such as oil, copper or agricultural products, there is an enormous discrepancy between annual production (= flow) and the total available stock of gold. In other words, gold has a high stock-to-flow ratio (SFR). The high stock-to-flow ratio is the most important characteristic of gold (and silver). The total gold ever mined amounts to almost 213,000 tons. Annual production in 2023 was just over 3,650 tons. Dividing the two amounts gives a stock-to-flow ratio of 58.4, which means that the current annual production must be maintained for more than 58 years to double the current gold stock.

	Total reserves in tons (stock)	% share of total reserves (stock)
Jewelry	96,500	45%
Private holdings (bars, coins, ETF)	47,500	22%
Central bank holdings	36,.700	17%
Others	32,000	15%
Total	212,600	100%
Estimated mining production (flow)	3,600	1.7% of total stock

Gold holdings are currently growing by around 1.7% a year, which is much slower than all monetary aggregates around the world. This growth is roughly in line with population growth. Confidence in the current and future purchasing power of money depends largely on how much money is currently available and how the quantity will change in the future.

Gold Stock (Above Ground Gold), in Tonnes, Money Supply (US M2), in USD bn, 1910-2023

Year	Gold Stock	yoy	Money Supply	yoy	Year	Gold Stock	yoy	Money Supply	yoy
1910	35,626	2.0%			1970	90,695	1.7%	626.5	6.6%
1911	36,325	2.0%			1971	92,145	1.6%	710.3	13.4%
1912	37,030	1.9%			1972	93,535	1.5%	802.3	13.0%
1913	37,724	1.9%			1973	94,885	1.4%	855.5	6.6%
1914	38,387	1.8%	26.0		1974	96,135	1.3%	902.1	5.4%
1915	39,091	1.8%	30.0	15.4%	1975	97,335	1.2%	1,016.2	12.6%
1916	39,776	1.8%	34.9	16.3%	1976	98,545	1.2%	1,152.0	13.4%
1917	40,407	1.6%	40.9	17.1%	1977	99,755	1.2%	1,270.3	10.3%
1918	40,985	1.4%	46.2	12.9%	1978	100,965	1.2%	1,366.0	7.5%
1919	41,535	1.3%	52.0	12.7%	1979	102,175	1.2%	1,473.7	7.9%
1920	42,042	1.2%	51.3	-1.4%	1980	103,395	1.2%	1,599.8	8.6%
1921	42,540	1.2%	45.7	-10.9%	1981	104,675	1.2%	1,755.5	9.7%
1922	43,021	1.1%	50.5	10.5%	1982	106,015	1.3%	1,905.9	8.6%
1923	43,575	1.3%	50.7	0.4%	1983	107,415	1.3%	2,123.5	11.4%
1924	44,167	1.4%	53.9	6.3%	1984	108,875	1.4%	2,306.4	8.6%
1925	44,758	1.3%	57.6	6.9%	1985	110,405	1.4%	2,492.1	8.1%
1926	45,360	1.3%	56.1	-2.5%	1986	112,015	1.5%	2,728.0	9.5%
1927	45,957	1.3%	56.7	1.1%	1987	113,675	1.5%	2,826.4	3.6%
1928	46,560	1.3%	58.2	2.6%	1988	115,545	1.6%	2,988.2	5.7%
1929	47,169	1.3%	57.7	-0.9%	1989	117,555	1.7%	3,152.5	5.5%
1930	47,817	1.4%	54.3	-5.8%	1990	119,735	1.9%	3,271.8	3.8%
1931	48,512	1.5%	47.7	-12.3%	1991	121,895	1.8%	3,372.2	3.1%
1932	49,266	1.6%	44.3	-7.1%	1992	124,155	1.9%	3,424.7	1.6%
1933	50,059	1.6%	42.9	-3.1%	1993	126,435	1.8%	3,474.5	1.5%
1934	50,900	1.7%	49.4	15.0%	1994	128,695	1.8%	3,486.4	0.3%
1935	51,824	1.8%	58.4	18.3%	1995	130,925	1.7%	3,629.5	4.1%
1936	52,854	2.0%	66.6	14.0%	1996	133,215	1.7%	3,818.6	5.2%
1937	53,954	2.1%	62.7	-5.8%	1997	135,665	1.8%	4,032.9	5.6%
1938	55,124	2.2%	68.4	9.0%	1998	138,165	1.8%	4,375.2	8.5%
1939	56,354	2.2%	77.5	13.3%	1999	140,735	1.9%	4,638.0	6.0%
1940	57,664	2.3%	90.1	16.3%	2000	143,325	1.8%	4,925.0	6.2%
1941	58,744	1.9%	103.4	14.7%	2001	145,925	1.8%	5,433.8	10.3%
1942	59,864	1.9%	133.9	29.6%	2002	148,475	1.7%	5,772.0	6.2%
1943	60,760	1.5%	168.8	26.0%	2003	151,015	1.7%	6,067.3	5.1%
1944	61,573	1.3%	191.3	13.3%	2004	153,435	1.6%	6,418.3	5.8%
1945	62,335	1.2%	215.6	12.7%	2005	155,905	1.6%	6,681.9	4.1%
1946	63,195	1.4%	226.4	5.0%	2006	158,275	1.5%	7,071.6	5.8%
1947	64,095	1.4%	238.0	5.1%	2007	160,625	1.5%	7,471.6	5.7%
1948	65,027	1.5%	234.6	-1.4%	2008	162,925	1.4%	8,192.1	9.6%
1949	65,991	1.5%	234.0	-0.3%	2009	165,415	1.5%	8,496.0	3.7%
1950	66,870	1.3%	244.5	4.5%	2010	168,246	1.7%	8,801.8	3.6%
1951	67,753	1.3%	258.1	5.6%	2011	171,145	1.7%	9,660.1	9.8%
1952	68,621	1.3%	268.1	3.8%	2012	174,057	1.7%	10,459.7	8.3%
1953	69,485	1.3%	271.0	1.1%	2013	177,196	1.8%	11,035.0	5.5%
1954	70,450	1.4%	278.4	2.7%	2014	180,571	1.9%	11,684.9	5.9%
1955	71,397	1.3%	284.6	2.2%	2015	183,945	1.9%	12,346.8	5.7%
1956	72,375	1.4%	288.1	1.3%	2016	187,498	1.9%	13,213.4	7.0%
1957	73,395	1.4%	286.0	-0.7%	2017	191,048	1.9%	13,857.9	4.9%
1958	74,445	1.4%	297.0	3.8%	2018	194,693	1.9%	14,362.7	3.6%
1959	75,575	1.5%	298.6	0.6%	2019	198,295	1.9%	15,320.7	6.7%
1960	76,765	1.6%	312.4	4.6%	2020	201,738	1.7%	19,114.6	24.8%
1961	77,995	1.6%	335.5	7.4%	2021	205,309	1.8%	21,546.6	12.7%
1962	79,285	1.7%	362.7	8.1%	2022	208,921	1.8%	21,346.3	-0.9%
1963	80,625	1.7%	393.2	8.4%	2023	212,582	1.8%	20,827.2	-2.4%
1964	82,015	1.7%	424.7	8.0%
1965	83,455	1.8%	459.2	8.1%
1966	84,905	1.7%	480.2	4.6%
1967	86,325	1.7%	524.8	9.3%
1968	87,765	1.7%	566.8	8.0%
1969	89,215	1.7%	587.9	3.7%

Annual gold production is relatively small

What does this mean in concrete terms? If mine production were to double – which is extremely unlikely – this would only mean an increase of 3.4% for the total stock of gold. This would still be a relatively insignificant inflation of the gold stock, especially compared to the current central bank inflation. If, on the other hand, production were to cease for a year, this would also have little impact on the total stock and pricing. If, on the other hand, a significant proportion of oil production were to be lost for a longer period of time, stocks would be depleted after a few weeks. Strong increases or decreases in production can therefore be absorbed much more easily.

We therefore assume that gold is not so valuable because it is so rare, but quite the opposite: gold is valued so highly because the annual production is so low in relation to the stock. This characteristic has been acquired over the centuries and can no longer change. This stability and security is a key prerequisite for creating trust. This clearly distinguishes gold as a monetary metal from other commodities and precious metals. Commodities are consumed, while gold is hoarded. This also explains why conventional supply/demand models can only be used to a limited extent on the gold market. Or as Robert Blumen once put it: “Contrary to the consumption model, the price of gold does clear the supply of recently mined gold against coin buyers; it clears all buyers against all sellers and holders. The amount of gold available at any price depends largely on the preferences of existing gold owners, because they own most of the gold.”[1]

For a commodity that is consumed, a rising deficit would clearly trigger higher prices until equilibrium is restored. Not so with a good that is hoarded. A simple consumption model therefore only works for goods that are consumed and whose annual production is high in relation to the stock (= low stock-to-flow ratio).

Current mining costs are insignificant for the gold price

This is why the production costs of gold play a subordinate role in pricing. They are primarily relevant for the performance of gold stocks. In our opinion, analyses that state that the gold price cannot fall below production costs are based on a fundamental fallacy. Although mining would be uneconomical for the majority of mine operators above a certain price, trading in gold that has already been mined would not come to a standstill. While mining therefore has little influence on the gold price, the reverse is not true. The gold price naturally has a considerable influence on mining and its profitability.[2]

There is no generally equal production cost rate for all mines – the costs depend on the characteristics of the mine and the reserves. Even the cost of producing individual ounces from the same mine can vary. The gold price in relation to labor costs and the cost price of capital goods determines whether a mine is profitable or not, and what gold can be profitably extracted from a mine. As the price of gold rises in relation to production costs, previously unprofitable reserves can become profitable to mine.

The demand side consists of investors, the jewelry industry, central banks and industry. However, this is actually only a fraction of the total demand. The majority of demand is so-called reservation demand. This term describes gold owners who do not want to sell gold at the current level. By not selling at the current price level, they are responsible for ensuring that the price remains at the same level.[3]

The decision not to sell gold at the current price level is therefore just as important as the decision to buy gold. The net effect on price discovery is the same. The supply of gold is therefore always high. At a price of USD 5,000, the supply of old gold would amount to a multiple of annual production. This also explains why the much-cited “gold deficit” is a myth and why there can be no shortage. Robert Blumen once formulated this aspect as follows: “Gold is an asset. Supply and demand should be understood in the same way that we understand the shares of a company. Every time shares change hands, the shares are demanded by a buyer and supplied by a seller. For each and every transaction, supply equals demand. Adding up all of the transactions that occur on a particular exchange, over the course of a month or a year, tells you absolutely nothing…If you said that buyers in China had bought 100 million shares of Microsoft but ‘no supplier could supply that many shares,’ nor was the company issuing enough new shares to meet the demand, you would readily see the error in that statement… Everyone understands that new shares only dilute the value of the existing shareholders, that it is not required for a company to issue new shares for the price to go up or down and that most trading of shares consists of existing shareholders selling to people who have dollars.”[4]

Just as increasing the money supply dilutes the purchasing power of the money in circulation and issuing new shares leads to a dilution of the old ones, an increase in the supply of gold should be seen as a dilution of the existing supply. An increase of 1% is absorbed by the market by the price falling by 1%, while the nominal supply remains the same.

With the exception of the past four years, there is a clear positive correlation between the gold price in US dollars and the expanding supply of recycled gold. The low volume of recycled gold in relation to the gold price over the past four years could indicate that market participants are becoming accustomed to the higher price level and will only sell at significantly higher price levels. It also appears that gold is gradually moving from shaky to firm hands.

Whenever someone sells, it means that the gold price has reached its reserve price. Thus, someone is selling to someone with an implicitly higher reservation price – which results from the fact that they are willing to buy at that price. This means that larger sales (for example by central banks) contribute to an improvement in the market structure.

Conclusion

The gold market should be seen as a holistic market. In our opinion, the distinction between annual new supply and total supply is incorrect and leads to false conclusions. All sources of supply are of equal value, as every ounce of gold available for sale is in competition with other ounces. It does not matter whether the gold was mined 3,000 years ago or 3 months ago or consists of recycled dental gold, for example. The current annual gold production of more than 3,600 tons is therefore relatively insignificant for pricing.

Annual gold production is also only subject to very minor fluctuations, in contrast to fiat money, whose annual rate of change fluctuates strongly. Over the past quarter of a century, M1 for the euro has fluctuated on a quarterly basis between just under -10% in Q3/2023 and +17% in Q4/2005, while M2 for the US dollar has gone from -4.1% in Q2/2023 to more than +25% in Q1/2021. Ludwig von Mises summarized these theoretical findings perfectly: “If a thing has to be used as a medium of exchange, public opinion must not believe that the quantity of this thing will increase beyond  all bounds.” 

---

[1] Blumen, Robert: “Does Gold Mining Matter?”, Mises Institute, August 14, 2009

[2] See Blumen, Robert: “Does Gold Mining Matter?”, Mises Institute, August 14, 2009

[3] See Blumen, Robert: „WSJ does not understand how the gold price is formed“, May 30, 2010

[4] Blumen, Robert: “Does Gold Mining Matter?”, Mises Institute, August 14, 2009

The biggest misconception with regard to gold – High stock-to-flow ratio is the most important characteristic of gold

In this brief, 13-minute compilation of insights from 2023, VON GREYERZ, AG partner, Matthew Piepenburg, reminds us of prior warnings which are truer than ever (and playing out) today as the stock market totally divorces itself from the real (and recessionary) economy. There’s a reason gold is spiking, for despite a Fed-driven and hence entirely “Pavlovian” S&P, recessionary forces will force further currency debasement to monetize unsustainable debt levels. Looking purely at the recessionary forces of 2023, which Piepenburg bluntly unpacks with data rather than drama, the current disconnect between rising markets and a bleeding economy into 2024 should have all investors thinking carefully about what lies ahead, including an inflationary endgame which Piepenburg will unpack in subsequent video compilations.

For now, keep the economic facts discussed here clear in mind when positioning and protecting your wealth, and hence gold, in the currents to come.

The biggest misconception with regard to gold – High stock-to-flow ratio is the most important characteristic of gold

The world’s best kept investment secret is GOLD.

• Gold has gone up 7.5X this century
• Gold Compound annual return since 2000 is 9.2%
• Dow Jones Compound annual return since 2000 is 7.7% incl. reinvested dividends

So why are only 0.6% of global financial assets in gold?

The simple answer is that most investors don’t understand gold because governments suppress the virtues of gold. 

GOVERNMENTS WILL ALWAYS LIE TO THEIR PEOPLE

Has anyone ever heard a Western government tell their people that gold is the best protection against their government’s total mismanagement of the economy and their currency?

Has any government ever told their people that throughout history all governments, without fail, have destroyed the total value of the people’s money?

That includes every single currency in history since no currency has ever survived. 

And have current governments told their people that since 1971, their currencies have declined by 97% to 99%?

So why don’t governments tell their people that in the next 50-100 years their currency will lose another 97-100%?

Obviously, no government would ever be elected if they told their people the truth that the economy and their money will continue to be mismanaged and destroyed like it has throughout history. 

And why don’t governments study history where they could learn from their predecessors mistakes?

And why don’t journalists study the history of money and educate the people?

The answer is obvious, journalism is just government propaganda and there is not a serious investigative journalist around today. 

INVESTMENT MANAGEMENT INDUSTRY IN DENIAL. 

In addition, the whole investment management industry neither understands nor likes gold. 

Studying and understanding money doesn’t serve their purpose. Better to create a mystique around a mediocre industry that on average underperforms the market. 

A greedy and self-serving investment management industry is not interested in gold. Gold doesn’t allow them to churn commission which is important for their survival. 

This whole industry could be abolished with most investments being held in index funds and physical gold. The net performance would most probably be superior to a very and inefficient industry. 

DRIVERS FOR GOLD

In the 12 minute video extract from a Palisade Radio interview below, I discuss the drivers for gold. 

In summary the important drivers discussed which will soon propel gold to much higher levels are:

• Global deficits & debts – US, Europe, China, Japan, Emerging markets 
• War
• Social unrest
• Gold buying by BRICS countries 
• Central bank gold purchases of gold due to move from Dollar reserve assets to Gold

GOLD IS THE BEST WEALTH PRESERVATION ASSET THROUGHOUT HISTORY

• Gold is not an investment. It is nature’s money and thus the only money which has survived in history.
• Governments and Central Banks are Gold’s best friend. Throughout history they have without fail destroyed the value of Fiat money whilst Gold has for thousands of years maintained its purchasing power. 
• As I discuss in the interview, risk is today greater globally than any time in history. 
• Physical Gold is the ultimate protection against such risk. 
• Gold for WEALTH PRESERVATION  purposes must be held in physical form with direct access by the investor. 
• Gold must obviously be held outside a fractured financial system. No use holding your gold in the system that you are protecting against. 
• NEVER, EVER hold gold in paper form or ETFs. 

• Gold must be held in a safe jurisdiction outside your country of residence and especially outside the US, Canada and the EU. 
• Gold and Silver are not just for the wealthy. You can buy 1 gram for $70 or one ounce of silver for $25.
• With major bubbles in virtually all asset classes including stocks, bonds and property, the allocation to physical gold and some silver should be at least 25% of your financial assets and potentially much more. 

NEVER worry about the gold price. Governments will continue to devalue your fiat money and thus revalue gold as they have throughout history. 

The biggest misconception with regard to gold – High stock-to-flow ratio is the most important characteristic of gold

All Empires die without fail, so do all Fiat currencies. But gold has been shining for 5000 years and as I explain in this article, Gold is likely to outshine virtually all assets in the next 5-10 years. 

In early 2002 we made major investments in physical gold for our investors and ourselves. At the time gold was around $300. Our primary objective was wealth preservation. The Nasdaq had already crashed 67% but before the bottom was reached, it lost another 50%. The total loss was 80% with many companies going bankrupt. 

In 2006, just over 4 years later, the Great Financial Crisis started. In 2008, the financial system was minutes from imploding. Banks like JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley and many others were bankrupt – BANCA ROTTA – (see my article First Gradually then Suddenly, The Everything Collapse) 

Virtually unlimited money printing postponed the collapse and since 2008 US total debt has almost doubled to $100 trillion. 

Gold backing of a currency doesn’t always solve a debt problem but it certainly makes it more difficult for the government to cook the books which they do without fail.

BONFIRE OF THE US BUDGET BOOKS

So tricky Dick (Nixon) couldn’t make ends meet in the late 1960s – early 70s partly due to the Vietnam war. 

Thus in 1971 Nixon, by closing the Gold window, started the most spectacular bonfire of the US government budget books. How wonderful, no more accountability, no more shackles and no more gold deliveries to de Gaulle in France who was clever to ask for gold instead of dollars in debt settlement from the US. 

So from August 1971, the US embarked on a money printing and credit expansion bonanza never seen before in history. 

Total US debt went from $2 trillion in 1971 to $200 trillion today – up 100X!

Since most major currencies were linked to the dollar under the Bretton Woods system, the closing of the gold window started a global free for all with the printing press (including bank credit) replacing REAL MONEY i.e. GOLD. 

The consequences of this “temporary” move by Nixon is that all Fiat or paper money has declined by 97-99% since 1971. 

The price of assets have obviously inflated correspondingly. In 1971 total US financial assets were $2 trillion. Today they are $130 trillion, up 65X. 

And if we include off balance sheet assets including the shadow banking system and derivatives, we are looking at assets (which will become liabilities) in excess of $2 quadrillion. 

I forecast the derivative bubble and demise of Credit Suisse in this article (Archegos & Credit Suisse – Tip of the Iceberg) and also in this one (The $2.3 Quadrillion Global Debt Time Bomb).

HEADS, GOLD WINS – TAILS, GOLD WINS

Luke Gromen in his Tree Rings report puts forward two options for the world economy which can be summarised as follows:

1. Dedollarisation continues, the Petrodollar dies and gold gradually replaces the dollar as a global commodity trading currency especially in the commodity rich BRICS countries. This would allow commodity prices to stay low as gold rises and drives a virtuous circle of global trade.  

If the above option sounds too good to be true especially bearing in mind the bankrupt status of the global financial system, Luke puts forward a much less pleasant outcome. 

And in my view, Luke’s alternative outcome is sadly more likely, namely:

2. “China, the US Treasury market, and the global economy implode spectacularly, sending the world into a new Great Depression, political instability, and possibly WW3…in which case, gold probably rises spectacularly all the same, as bonds and then equities scramble for one of the only assets with no counterparty risk – gold.   (BTC is another.)”

Yes, Bitcoin could go to $1 million as I have often said but it could also go to Zero if it is banned. Too binary for me and not a good wealth preservation risk in any case.

As Gromen says, there is a virtuous case and there is a vicious case for the world economy. 

But above both cases shines GOLD!

So why hold the worthless paper money or bubble assets when you can protect yourself with Gold!

FOR THE CBO BAD TIMES DON’T EXIST

The US Central Budget Office – CBO – has recently made a 10 year forecast.

Obviously, the CBO assumes no depression or even a little recession in the next 10 years!

Isn’t it wonderful to be a government employee and have a mandate to only forecast GOOD NEWS!  

And although the CBO forecasts a debt increase of $21 trillion by 2034 to a total of $55 trillion, they expect inflation to stay around 2%!

As I have stated in many articles, the US Federal debt has doubled every 8 years on average since Reagan became President in 1981!

I see no reason to deviate from that long term trend although there can be short term deviations. So based on that simple but historically accurate extrapolation, I could forecast the increase from $10 trillion to $20 trillion debt in 2009 when Obama took over from Bush Jr.

Extrapolating this trend, the US Federal Debt will reach $100 trillion in 2036. 

With debts and deficits increasing exponentially, it is not unlikely that as inflation catches fire again, $100 trillion Federal Debt will be reached earlier than 2036.

Just think about a big number of bank failures, which is guaranteed, plus major defaults in the $2+ quadrillion derivative market. Against such dire background, it would be surprising if US debt doesn’t go far beyond $100 trillion by the mid 2030s!

 STOCK MARKET BUBBLE & LEADERSHIP SWAPS

Investors and many analysts are still bullish about the stock market. As we know, markets will move higher until all investors, especially retail, are sucked in and until most of the shorts have liquidated their positions.

It has been a remarkable bull market based on unlimited debt creation. Nobody worries about the fact that 7 stocks are creating this mania. These stocks are well known to most investors: Alphabet (Google), Amazon, Apple, Meta (Facebook), Microsoft, Nvidia and Tesla. 

These Magnificent 7 have a total market cap of $13 trillion. That is the same as the combined GDP of Germany, Japan, India and the UK! Only the US and China are bigger. 

When 7 companies are greater than 4 of the biggest industrial economies in the world, it is time to fire the management of these countries and maybe do a swap.

GATES, COOK, MUSK TAKING OVER GERMANY, UK & FRANCE

What about Germany’s Chancellor Scholz running Amazon. Or Rishi Sunak in the UK being in charge of Microsoft? How long would it take them to destroy these companies? Not many years in my view. They would quickly double the benefits for workers and increase debts to unsustainable levels.  

But Germany and the UK would most certainly benefit from Bill Gates of Microsoft taking on Germany and Tim Cook of Apple running the UK. They would of course need dictatorial powers in order to take the draconian measures required. Only then could they slash inefficiencies, halve benefits and reduce taxes by at least 50%.

If the entrepreneurs just got a very small percentage of the improvement in the countries’ finances as remuneration, they would make much more money than they are currently.  

Even more fascinating would be to see Elon Musk as French President. He would fire at least 80% of state employees and by doing that he might even get the militant French unions on his side and get the country back on its feet. 

An interesting thought experiment that of course will never happen. 

WHY IS EVERYONE WAITING FOR NEW GOLD HIGHS IN ORDER TO BUY???

For almost 25 years I have been standing on a soapbox to inform investors of the importance of wealth preservation.

Still only just over 0.5% of global financial assets have been invested in gold. In 1960 it was 5% in gold and in 1980 when gold peaked at $850, it was 2.7%.

For a quarter of a century, gold has gone up 7- 8X in most Western currencies and exponentially more in weak currencies like the Argentine Pesos or Venezuelan Bolivar. 

In spite of gold outperforming most asset classes in this century, it remains at less than 1% of Global Financial Assets – GFA. Currently at $2,100 gold is at 0.6% of GFA.  

WE HAVE LIFTOFF! 

So gold has now broken out and very few investors are participating. 

This stealth move that gold has made has left virtually every investor behind as this table shows: 

The clever buyers are of course the BRICS central banks. Almost all of their purchases are off market so in the short term it has only a marginal effect on the gold price. 

But now the squeeze has started as my good friend Alasdair Macleod explains so well on King World News. The Comex was never meant for physical deliveries but only for cash settlements. But now buyers are standing for physical delivery. We have also seen last month major exports of gold from the US to Switzerland. These are either Comex 400 ounce bars or US government bars sold/leased and sent to the Swiss refiners and broken down to 1 kg bars for onwards export to the BRICS. These bars will never return again even if they are only leased and not sold. 

The above process will one day bring panic to the gold market as there will be nowhere near enough physical gold for all the paper claims. 

So for any gold investors who don’t hold physical gold in a safe jurisdiction (NOT USA), I suggest that they quickly move their gold to a private vault where they have personal access, preferably in Switzerland or Singapore.

So NO FRACTIONAL GOLD OWNERSHIP, NO GOLD ETFs or FUNDS and NO GOLD IN BANKS!

At least not if you want to be sure to get hold of your gold as the gold squeeze starts. 

GOLD IS ON THE CUSP OF A MAJOR MOVE 

Having just broken out, gold is now on its way to much, much higher levels. 

As I keep on saying, forecasting the gold price is a mug’s game. 

What is the purpose of predicting a price level when the unit you measure gold in (USD, EUR, GBP etc) is continually debasing and worth less every month. 

All investors need to know is that every single currency in history has without fail gone to ZERO as Voltaire said already in 1727. 

Since the early 1700s, over 500 currencies have become extinct, most of them due to hyperinflation. 

Only since 1971 all major currencies have lost 97-99% of their purchasing power measured in gold. In the next 5-10 years they will lose the remaining 1-3% which of course is 100% from here. 

But gold will not only continue to maintain purchasing power, it will do substantially better.  This is due to the coming collapse of all bubble assets – Stocks, Bonds, Property etc. The world will not be able to avoid the Everything Collapse or First Gradually then Suddenly – The Everything Collapse  as I wrote about in two articles in 2023. 

YES, GOLD IS ON THE CUSP OF A MAJOR MOVE AS:

• Wars continue to ravage the world.
• Inflation rises strongly due to ever increasing debts and deficits.
• Currency continues their journey to ZERO.
• The world flees from stocks, bonds, and the US dollar. 
• The BRICS countries continue to buy ever bigger amounts of gold.
• Central Banks buy major amounts of gold as currency reserves instead of US dollars.
• Investors rush into gold at any price to preserve their wealth. 

GOLD AS CHEAP AS IN 1971 OR 2000

The chart below indicates that gold in early 2020 at $1700 was as cheap as in 1971 at $35 and in 2000 at $300 in relation to money supply.

 

At this point we do not have an updated chart but it is our estimate that the monetary base has probably kept pace with the gold price meaning that the level in 2024 is similar to 2020. 

So let me repeat my mantra:

Please jump on the Gold Wagon while there is still time to preserve your wealth. 

The coming surge in gold demand cannot be met by more gold because more than the current 3000 tonnes of gold per annum cannot be mined. 

THUS THE ONLY MEANS TO SATISFY THE COMING GOLD MANIA IS THROUGH MUCH HIGHER PRICES. 

The biggest misconception with regard to gold – High stock-to-flow ratio is the most important characteristic of gold

In this brief yet refreshingly blunt discussion, VON GREYERZ partner, Matthew Piepenburg joins David Lin at the Vancouver Resource Investment Conference. From Canada, Piepenburg fleshes out the longer-term facts vs. the short-term inflation “debate” and the now mathematical inevitability of further USD debasement to “save” an objectively broken financial system.

The conversation opens with the media-ignored (and almost comical) denial of an economic hard-landing despite current market highs driven by forward-guided rate hikes. Piepenburg reduced the stock market to a Pavlovian dog which simply turns up or down on dovish or hawkish Fed policies. Free market capitalism is now entirely perverted.

Powell’s projected rate cuts, necessary to bail out private and sovereign bonds repricing in 2024, is a tailwind for over-valued stocks but is not a sign of economic strength. Instead, we are seeing centralized markets, Fed desperation and a further postponed debt reckoning. The end-game will be “mouse-clicked” trillions to monetize unwanted USTs, the net result of which, is naturally inflationary.

Piepenburg reminds that such an inflationary end-game is part of undeniable and historical debt patterns which are always blamed on “external” forces which then justify increased policy dishonesty, as well as political control and centralization. This sickening pattern, he says, is historically true “without exception” as policy makers “prostitute sound debt policies at the expense of the many for the benefit of the few.”

Of course, sacrificing the currency to extend and pretend otherwise broken risk asset markets and purchase votes in the near-term ruins Main Street purchasing power while creating social unrest–the political, social, cultural and financial evidence of which is literally everywhere we look.

Gold, by itself, can’t save the financial system from these abuses and mis-uses of power and political opportunists. Leaders and central bankers will continue to maintain power while perverting currencies and pointing the blame outside their bathroom mirrors. This, however, does not prevent sophisticated investors from protecting their own wealth against currency destruction by owning their own physical gold outside of a failed financial order and Fed-protected banking system.

The biggest misconception with regard to gold – High stock-to-flow ratio is the most important characteristic of gold

In this brief yet substantive conversation with Charlotte McLeod of Investing News Network, VON GREYERZ partner, Matthew Piepenburg, bluntly answers the financial questions and concerns which political figures and central bankers have a vested interest in mis-representing.

Toward that end, he highlights the recessionary facts which are currently being ignored by an S&P rising on rate cut projections from the US Federal Reserve. As for pending rate cuts, Piepenburg argues that Powell will indeed cut rates in 2024 for the simple reason that Uncle Sam (and risk asset markets) can’t afford “Higher for Longer” much longer…

Of course, rate cuts make Piepenburg temporarily bullish on equities, as lower rates are an obvious tailwind for risk assets which go up or down depending on whether central banks are dovish or hawkish.

As for gold, this asset wins regardless of which direction—hawkish or dovish—the Fed takes. Should Powell cut rates (dovish), the USD declines and gold outperforms. However, should Powell be bluffing and stick to higher rates (hawkish), then risk asset markets tank and gold ultimately rises above that chaos. Again, gold will rise in either scenario.

Most importantly, Piepenburg sees an ultimate and inflationary end-game when the Fed is eventually required to resort to extreme QE (mouse-click money) to monetize the trillions in deficit spending projected out of the US Congressional Budget Office. Stated simply, Uncle Sam is drowning debt, and the only buyer of his IOUs will be a Fed money printer, which is inherently inflationary. As such, gold will rise because the USD will be debased to pay Uncle Sam’s debt.

As Piepenburg concludes, this pattern of debasing sovereign currencies to save otherwise rotten debt systems is nothing new. In fact, and without exception, this is what all broke(n) regimes have done throughout history. The US, and USD, will be no exception, which means gold will be exceptional.

The biggest misconception with regard to gold – High stock-to-flow ratio is the most important characteristic of gold

VON GREYERZ founder and chairman, Egon von Greyerz, sits down with Investor Talk’s Jan Kneist to discuss his outlook for 2024, which includes clear signs that now, more than ever, investors need to be prepared for an historic wealth transfer.

Egon opens with a brief explanation of the naturally evolved name change from Matterhorn Asset Management AG to VON GREYERZ AG. He places specific emphasis on the values and principles behind the family name–the very same values which will mark his enterprise for generations to come.

As to looking forward, Egon’s core views of current and future financial conditions are driven by a consistent understanding of past lessons and patterns. Market patterns today, for example, are reminiscent of the boom and bust cycles of yesterday; he addresses the massive (and dangerous) over-valuation in current markets with greater detail.

As to inflation concerns, Egon’s conviction for a much higher inflationary end-game remains the same. Current Fed balance sheet tightening (QT) is also discussed. Given massive deficit levels in the US, the shift toward synthetic liquidity to monetize US debts will make future QE inevitable. As Egon reminds, demand for USTs is weakening not strengthening, a fact made even more obvious by the West’s absurd decision to freeze the FX reserves of a major economy like Russia.

In short, trust in the American IOU has now irrevocably fallen, all of which places more pressure on the Fed as the buyer of last resort for its own national debt—all classic characteristics of a banana republic.

Turning to gold, its superior performance over the last two decades remains ignored and misunderstood by the vast majority of pundits and investors. Of course, once this misunderstanding (and BIS-led great deception) becomes clear to more investors, the subsequent demand for this relatively fixed-supply asset will send gold’s price much higher in the years ahead. The DOW-Gold ratio, Egon argues, will reach 1:1, which means risk assets will see pain and physical gold will surge in price as global debt levels send markets and economies toward historical turning points, from the US to China.

This, of course, requires sophisticated investors to think more about preparation and wealth preservation over delusion and speculation. Gold, and VON GREYERZ, serve to provide such preservation.

The biggest misconception with regard to gold – High stock-to-flow ratio is the most important characteristic of gold

In late December, I published a final report on the themes of 2023 while looking ahead at their implications for the year to come.

I repeated my claim that debt markets and debt levels made the future of Fed policies, currency moves, rate markets and gold’s endgame fairly clear to see.

Of course, as facts change, opinions change as well.

But the facts are only worsening, which means my opinions in late 2023 are only growing stronger as we conclude the first month of 2024.

Then as now, the debt-soaked US is tilting ever more toward policies which will weaken its currency, wound its middleclass and reward its false idols (and false markets) with even greater desperation.

In particular, some recent facts below are emerging which further support my otherwise sad conviction that the American economy (not to be confused with its Fed-supported stock exchanges) is literally living on borrowed time.

The Latest Bits of Crazy from the CBO

Almost a year ago to date, I was shaking my head and rubbing my eyes as the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) announced a staggering $422B Federal budget deficit for Q1 2023.

Now that’s a lot of borrowing in a short amount of time…

For some strange reason, this bothered me in early 2023, as I was still under this odd impression that debt, and hence deficits, actually mattered.

Fast forward to January 2024, and that same CBO has just announced a $509B Federal budget deficit for Q1 2024.

Folks, that adds up to annual deficit run rate of $2.2T.

Please: Re-read that last line again.

Do the Math: DC is Getting Even Dumber

In this 12-month interim, fiscal revenues did increase by about 8%, but outlays (i.e., expenses) for that same period rose by 12%, which is just a mathematical way of saying that either: 1) Uncle Sam is out of his mind in debt; or 2) that I am out of my mind in common sense.

But it seems I’m not the alone in saying out loud what no one DC can say to themselves, namely: The US is now in an open and obvious debt spiral.

Uncle Sam’s embarrassing bar tab of debt is now racing at a rate that far exceeds his GDP, pushing the deficit to GDP ratio toward 8% and higher–ratios we’ve never seen except during the GFC of 2008 and the “COVID” (i.e., hidden bond) crisis of 2020.

From Debt Spiral to Super QE

If recent memory serves me correctly, in both of those embarrassing years (and ratios), what followed was QE to the moon and the ongoing fantasy that every debt problem can be solved with trillions of fiat dollars mouse-clicked out of thin air.

And this time around will likely be no different, as I and others like Luke Gromen have been warning week after week, and month after month.

Such warnings, which NO ONE can time, are not merely bearish “opinions” and don’t require a crystal ball or sensational guessing.

They just require a calculator and a basic understanding of history.

Simple Math

As to basic math, one can have their own opinions but not their own facts, and the facts (i.e., math) tell us that the current cost of servicing the aforementioned debt is 16% of Federal tax receipts.

Again: Please re-read that last line. It matters, because, well…debt destroys nations.

Nor am I alone in this sober understanding.

As the former head of European block trading at Goldman Sachs, Alex Harfouche, just warned, these sickening debt ratios mean the US economy’s ability to shoulder such debt is both “horrible” and “crippling.”

Which means we all know (or should know) what’s coming next.

The Patterns of the Foolish

As in 2008 and 2020, we can now see a pattern playing out in 2024, namely an inevitable shift from rate hikes and pauses toward rate cuts and the inevitable shift from QT to QE.

Why inevitable?

Because stupidity combined with a Will to Power that would make Nietzsche blush are the profile traits of nearly all math-ignorant but ego-savvy policy makers seeking re-election or a Nobel Prize in Economics (fiction?).

That is, and especially in an election year, policy makers will not cut spending but increase it in a desperate bid to bribe the gullible masses into a Pavlovian voting pattern based on generations of political over-promising and grotesque under-delivering.

This political inability to cut entitlement spending makes a US debt spiral (and hence QE to the moon) as foreseeable as the NY Yankees beating my high-school baseball team.

DC Cutting Rates Rather than Spending

Furthermore, since the DC children running our country into the ground won’t cut spending, the only thing they can (and will) cut is interest rates.

Why?

Because cutting rates not only takes pressure off Uncle Sam’s IOUs (USTs), but also eases the pain of those complicit S&P zombies staring down the barrel of over $740B in debt rollovers in 2024.

Main Street Screwed Again

Remember: The Fed serves TBTF banks and exchanges, not citizens and their realities.

Interest rate cuts + QE = a further debased USD and rising inflation (with a deflationary recession in the middle).

And this means the voters on Main Street are about to feel the darker side of DC’s real mandate: Covering their own A$$’es while keeping Wall Street on a respirator.

Meanwhile, the masses feel pain, but can’t quite see from where it’s coming, as the media, MMT hucksters and political Ken and Barbies keep telling them that deficits don’t matter.

Deficits Don’t Matter?

Even worse, there are those sitting in private wealth management suites smugly reminding their clients that Japan is in much worse debt (see below) than Uncle Sam, and if Japan can muddle through, certainly the US has nothing to fear.

But as I recently reminded the attendees at the Vancouver Resource Investment Conference, Japan does not have twin deficits, a negative 65% Net International Investment Position nor an externally financed bond market.

In short: Japan aint America. But even if it were, it’s nothing of which to boast…

Whistling Past the Debt Graveyard with More Spending

Like Luke Gromen, I am of the sober and math-based view that unless the US cuts entitlement and defense spending by 40% (unthinkable in an election year and a world of beating [US?] war drums almost everywhere), such austerity is about as likely as an honest man in Congress…

Failing such needed cuts and sound budget honesty, policy makers will merely whistle past another year of multi-trillion deficit levels and pass the bill on to current and future generations while inflating their way out of debt with more of the debased money in your pockets.

As I’ve written before, this is no surprise. In fact, it was the plan all along, despite Powell’s efforts to pretend otherwise.

Keep It Simple: Powell Will Pivot

Debtors, including Uncle Sam, need inflation and need a debased currency. 

They need negative real rates whereby inflation outpaces the yield on 10Y bonds.

Powell, of course, tried pushing real rates to a positive 2% to allegedly “fight inflation,” but, and as in 2018-19, the net result was that he simply broke nearly everything but the USD in the process.

In fact, Powell was merely raising rates and thinning the Fed balance sheet so that he’d have something (anything) to cut (rates) and fatten (balance sheet) when the recession that his higher-for-longer policies ushered in (and then denied) became too impossible to ignore.

Or stated more bluntly: His recent QT was a planned precursor to more QE, and his recent rate hikes were a planned precursor to more rate cuts.

Keep It Simple: A Future of Debased Currency

Thus, and long before hitting “target 2%,” Powell will once again throw in the towel in 2024 on rate hikes for the simple reason that Uncle Sam can’t afford them.

Or stated (and repeated) more simply, his “war on inflation,” waged in the last 2 years, will ultimately (and ironically) end in even greater inflation.

Ahhh the ironies. Or better yet: “The horror, the horror…”

History confirms this pattern in one debt-failed nation after the next.

In fact, and without exception, currencies are always sacrificed to save a broken regime. And folks, our regime is objectively broke(n).

Thus, for those who know the math (above), and the history of yesterday, preparing for tomorrow is simple.

Projected rate cuts (and the scent of more synthetic liquidity) can and (already have) sent inflated risk assets higher as the inherent purchasing power of the currency gets weaker.

Keep It Simple: Natural Gold vs. An Un-Natural Dollar

This simply means gold, though never marching in a straight line, will reach higher highs and lower lows for no other reason than paper currencies like the USD will get more debased.

And this is all because the issuance of unloved sovereign USTs will become greater and greater, as the opening data from the CBO in Q1 now makes factually clear.

Soon the Fed will run out of tricks within Treasury General Account (Yellen’s game) and the Reverse Repo Markets to generate fake liquidity for those over-supplied and under-demanded USTs.

And this means Powell will once again crank out the money printers at the Eccles Building to “buy” those IOUs.

Fortunately, Powell has no machine in DC to produce physical gold, which means this natural precious metal of unlimited duration yet finite supply will rise, while USTs, an unnatural asset of finite duration yet infinite supply, will continue to sink.

It’s just that simple.

The biggest misconception with regard to gold – High stock-to-flow ratio is the most important characteristic of gold

In this brief yet important conversation between Egon von Greyerz and Matthew Piepenburg, these former “MAMChatters” announce a new discussion series, GOLD MATTERS. The timing and series-change is both appropriate and exciting, as Matterhorn Asset Management, AG has now officially changed its entity name to VON GREYERZ, AG.

VON GREYERZ principal, Matthew Piepenburg, opens by explaining the new entity name as a natural and shared decision among the entire VON GREYERZ organization to reflect the insights and vision of its founder and Chairman, Egon von Greyerz.

As Matthew reminds, Egon’s professional career, which includes years in Swiss banking before taking a small UK retail enterprise to much greater heights as a listed FTSE 100 company, is one marked by a steady understanding of business ethics, personal values and disciplined growth. Those same characteristics shaped Egon’s journey in taking Matterhorn Asset Management from a small circle of family-and-friend investors into a global enterprise with clients in over 90 countries.

Matthew specifically enquires about Egon’s relationship with–and deep understanding of–global debt and risk levels as critical components of the VON GREYERZ narrative, the success of which Egon explains with the clarity earned from decades of experience. Gold, he reminds, is the culminating asset for those who understand the myriad risks now rising before us in real time, from fractured banking practices and geopolitical fissures to unsustainable debt levels and broken fiat currency systems. Toward this end, the VON GREYERZ wealth preservation service via physical gold is the perfect expression of (and name for) Egon’s deeply respected approach to solving for such risks.

Piepenburg concludes the discussion by announcing the enhanced VON GREYERZ website, which offers users an even richer experience (and on-site education) in not only why sophisticated investors own gold, but where and how it needs to be held, and not held, in the current global backdrop. The new website also underscores the menu of services behind VON GREYERZ, which have made it the industry leader in wealth preservation.

The biggest misconception with regard to gold – High stock-to-flow ratio is the most important characteristic of gold

With the US shooting itself in the foot again, we are now certain that this is the final farewell to the bankrupt dollar based monetary system.

More about this follows but, in the meantime, an extremely important warning: 

If you have never been a goldbug, this is the time to become one. 

I decided 25 years ago that the destiny of the world economy and the financial system necessitated the best form of wealth preservation that money could buy. 

And physical gold performs that role beautifully just as it has done for several thousands of years as every currency or fiat monetary system has collapsed without fail throughout history. 

Thus, at the beginning of this century we told our investor friends and ourselves to buy gold for up to 50% of investable liquid asset. 

So at $300 we acquired important amounts of gold and have never looked back. We have of course never sold any gold but only added since. 

I have never called myself a goldbug, just someone who wanted to protect assets against the risk of the destruction of the financial system including all currencies. But now is really the time to become a real gold bug. 

So, today just over 20 years later, gold is up 7 – 8X in most Western currencies and multiples of that in weaker economies like Argentina, Venezuela, Turkey etc.

The total mismanagement of the US financial system has led to the dollar losing 98% of it’s value since Nixon closed the gold window in 1971. Most other currencies have followed the dollar down at varying speeds. 

But now comes the really exciting phase of this race to the bottom. 

We have only 2% left for the dollar based currency system goes to ZERO. 

As Voltaire said in 1728, “Paper money always returns to its intrinsic value – ZERO.”

What we must remember is that the dollar doesn’t just have a further 2% to fall to reach zero. Because to reach zero, it will next fall 100% from where it is today. 

I know the sceptics will say that this is not possible. But these sceptics don’t know their history. Since fiat currencies’ record is perfect, no one must believe that because we live today, it is different to a 5,000 year faultless record of success, or shall we call it failure, of currencies always reaching zero. 

THE US CONTINUES TO SHOOT ITSELF IN THE FOOT

How many times can you shoot yourself in the foot and still walk upright with pride?

Well, the US government certainly has wounded itself mortally with both feet being so full of holes that there is hardly any space left for another hole. 

So, the latest hole in the US dollar foot is a proposal to steal $300 billion of Russian reserves and use the funds for the reconstruction of Ukraine.

A deadline has been set for the G7 nations to come up with the detailed proposal by 24 February. 

The proposal has obviously come from the US backed by its faithful lapdog the UK. 

Now don’t get me wrong, I really like the US and also the UK and their people but that doesn’t mean that I concur with the idiotic decisions taken by their governments without the consent of their people. 

So will 2024 be the year which, when all the evils which the West has created, erupt in the most violent chain of events political, civil wars, geopolitical, more war, terrorism, economic collapse including the fall of the monetary system. 

Well the ingredients are certainly present to create a picture similar to The Triumph of Death painting by Bruegel.  

We obviously hope that this is not where the world is heading but all the ingredients are sadly in place for the start of a series of events which will be both unpredictable and uncontrollable. “The Financial System has reached the End”

MOST MAJOR WARS SINCE WWII HAVE BEEN INSTIGATED BY THE US

As Merkel admitted, since the Minsk agreement in 2014, it was always the intention of the US to push Ukraine into a conflict with Russia. 

This war is still going on with more than 500,000 having been killed. (Since propaganda from both sides is a major part of a war, we will never know the correct figure.) 

It will obviously be very tempting for the G7 to use the $ 300 billion funds stolen, for the war since many countries’ parliaments are becoming reluctant to fund this war. 

So is the US and its allies going to set a precedent that should also apply for other wars?

Since the US initiated the attacks on Vietnam, Iraq, Libya, Syria and many other countries, should not the US foreign reserves be applied for the reconstruction of all these nations? 

But as always, it is one rule for the mighty US and another rule for its enemies. 

As Bush Jr said, “Either you are with us or you are with the terrorists.”

THE LAST PHASE OF THE DOLLAR DEBASEMENT NEXT

This very final phase of the dollar debasement to zero really started on June 29, 2022 when the US decided to seize all Russian financial assets. 

That action was the nail in the coffin (as well as the shot in the foot) of the Petrodollar system. This has been in place since 1973 to support the dollar with a payment system for black gold since yellow gold was no longer supporting the dollar. 

To seize a major sovereign state’s (Russia’s) assets can never end well. And then to give those assets to an enemy of that state (Ukraine) is guaranteed to seal the fate of the dollar dominant currency system and its backers. 

An economically weak EU gave its support with the Brexit UK always obeying its US masters. 

A historical post mortem of this total submission to the command of the US will clearly conclude that it was totally disastrous for the German economy as well as the rest of Europe. But sadly weak leaders always make disastrous decisions. 

And as the West has a massive surplus of weak leaders, it is running from one crisis to the next.

Is Treasury Secretary Yellen blind to what is happening to her economy or is she just giving the world the propaganda lies that all politicians must do to buy votes?

This is what Yellen said to the House Financial Services Committee in August 2023:

“The dollar plays the role it does in the world financial system for very good reasons that no other country is able to replicate, including China. We have deep liquid open financial markets, strong rule of law and an absence of capital controls that no country is able to replicate….. But the dollar is far and away the dominant reserve asset.”  – 

“Deep liquid financial markets” means “we” have until now been able to create unlimited amounts of worthless fiat money. “Strong rule of law” means that whoever totally obeys the US increasingly totalitarian system, like for example the Patriot Act, is protected by the law. And as regards capital controls, FATCA (Foreign Account Tax Compliance Act) that the US forced upon the world’s finical system in 2014 has led to a total US control of the global financial system.  

And as regards “the dollar is far and away the dominant reserve asset”, not for long Mrs Yellen. 

Has Janet heard of de-dollarisation, has she heard of the BRICS and has she understood that the runaway debts and deficits are destroying the fabric of the US economy and financial system?

Yes of course she knows all of this and she also knows that she can’t do anything about it except to print more money. So her principal role is to keep the pretences up and hope that the system will not collapse on her watch. And then hopefully she can pass the baton to the next treasury secretary unscathed, so that he/she can get the blame. 

BRICS

The BRICS already has 10 members, India, China, Brazil, Russia, South Africa, Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iran, Egypt and Ethiopia. 

In addition, another 30 countries want to join including for example Venezuela. 

The BRICS produce just under 50% of global oil. 

But if we look at oil reserves, the existing BRICS plus aspiring members like Venezuela, have over 20X the oil reserves of the US. 

PEAK ENERGY

Another major economic crisis for the world is the contracting energy system.

The world economy is driven by energy which means fossil fuels. Without sufficient energy the living standards would decline fatally. Currently fossil fuels account for 83% of the world’s energy. The heavy dependence on fossil fuels is unlikely to change in the next few decades.

 And as I have always believed, even electric vehicles are no longer the holy grail that world governments are trying to push onto consumers. There are just too many problems such as cost of buying and cost of repairs, range and questionable CO2 benefits. Also environmentally EVs are a disaster since batteries have a short life and cannot be recycled. 

But that’s not the only problem. For the first 60-70,000 miles an EV produces more CO2 than an ordinary vehicle.

Stocks are building up of unsold EVs, exacerbated by companies like Hertz selling off 20,000 vehicles. 

Also, to produce ONE battery takes 250 tons of rock and minerals. The effect is 10-20 tons of CO2 from mining and manufacturing even before the vehicle has been driven 1 metre. 

In addition, car batteries cannot be recycled but go to landfill which has major environmental implications. 

And as concerns renewable energy, it is unlikely to replace fossil fuels for a very, very long time even if this is a politically uncomfortable view for the climate control activists. What very few realise is that most renewable energy sources are very costly and also all dependent on fossil fuels whether it is electric cars, wind turbines or solar panels.

As the graph shows, the energy derived from fossil fuels has declined for the last few years. This trend will accelerate over the next 20+ years as the availability of fossil fuels decline and the cost increases. The economic cost of producing energy has gone up 5X since 1980.

What very few people realise is that the world’s prosperity does not improve with more debt but with more and cheaper energy.

But sadly, as the graph above shows, energy production is going to decline for at least 20 years.

Less energy means lower prosperity for the world. And remember that this is in addition to a major decline in prosperity due to the implosion of the financial system and asset values.

The graph above shows that energy from fossil fuels will decline by 18% between 2021 and 2040. But although Wind & Solar will proportionally increase, it will in no way compensate for the fall in fossil fuels. For renewable energy to make up the difference, it would need to increase by 900% with an investment exceeding $100 trillion.  This is highly unlikely since the production of Wind & Solar are heavily dependent on fossil fuels.

Another major problem is that there is no efficient method for storing Renewable energy.

Let’s just take the example of getting enough energy from batteries. The world’s largest battery factory is the Tesla Giga factory. The annual total output from this factory would produce 3 minutes of the annual US electricity demand. Even with 1,000 years of battery production, the batteries from this factory would produce only 2 days of US electricity demand.

So batteries will most probably not be a viable source of energy for decades especially since they need fossil fuels to be produced and charged.

Nuclear energy is the best available option today. But the time and cost of producing nuclear means that it will not be a viable alternative for decades. Also, many countries have stopped nuclear energy for political reasons. The graph above shows that nuclear and hydro will only increase very marginally in the next 20 years.

Of course the world wants to achieve cleaner and more efficient energy. But today we don’t have the means to produce this energy in quantity from anything but fossil fuels.

So stopping or reducing the production of fossil fuels, which is the desire of many politicians and climate activists, is guaranteed to substantially exacerbate the decline of the world economy.

We might get cleaner air but many would have to enjoy it in caves with little food or other necessities and conveniences that we have today.

So what is clear is that the world is not prepared for even the best scenario energy case which entails a major decline in the standard of living in the next 20-30 years at least.

IMMINENT DECLINE OF THE WORLD ECONOMY

The above explanation, of the world economy as an energy driven system, is important to grasp in order to understand the effect of the declining energy production. This decline together with the increased energy cost of producing energy will exacerbate the decline of the world economy. 

To add to this longer term energy crisis which very few people discuss or fathom, the world is facing the end of the current monetary system.

Yes, the BRICS countries will over time assume the mantle of the waning Western empire. 

But it won’t happen overnight, especially since the world’s second biggest economy, China, also has a debt problem almost as big as the US one.

Just look at the growth of China’s money supply in this century. No country has survived such an explosion of money supply without serious consequences.

The advantage that China has is that their financial and currency system is principally domestic and can therefore be resolved “in-house”.

JUMP ON THE GOLD WAGON

No one can forecast with certainty when an event will take place.

But what we can determine with great certainty is that the risk is imminent for the world economy and the Western monetary system to go through an uncontrollable  reset of proportions never seen before in history. 

What we also feel certain about is that the gold price very soon will reflect the major problems that the world economy is facing. 

In this century, gold has performed very strongly against all currencies as the table below shows. 

All major central banks will do all they can to support the gold price. 

The BRICS and other Eastern countries will accelerate their already substantial purchases of gold. And the West, led by the US will accelerate the debt creation and spend unfathomable amounts in futile attempts to save their collapsing economies. 

In June 2016 I advised investors to jump on the Goldwagon when gold was $1,300. https://vongreyerz.gold/get-on-the-goldwagon-to-10000/

Today with gold at $2,050 gold is still very cheap and anyone with some savings, small to very big, must now jump on the goldwagon and buy as much physical gold (and a bit of silver) as you can afford and then some more. 

Owning gold will not solve all our problems, but it will at least give us a very important nest egg and protection against the coming financial debacle that will hit the world.